图片交易平台_电影版权怎么申请_汇总

时间:2021-06-04 16:57编辑:弥辰版权来源:弥辰版权当前位置:主页 > 专利代理 >

图片交易平台_电影版权怎么申请_汇总

Paul, Weiss Obtains Vacatur of Class Certification Order for Citco Client News LitigationFinancial InstitutionsSecurities Litigation Share this See Also LitigationFinancial InstitutionsSecurities Litigation Share this Paul, Weiss achieved a major victory for our client Citco and several affiliated entities when the Second Circuit vacated an order of the Southern District of New York (Marrero) certifying a class of investors in four funds managed by the Fairfield Greenwich Group (Fairfield) that invested substantially all of the funds' assets with Bernard Madoff and remanded the matter to the district court. In the aftermath of the revelation of Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the Fairfield fund investors filed a putative class action against Fairfield and associated entities as managers of the funds, several Citco entities in their capacity as administrators and custodians for the funds, and the funds' outside auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). The plaintiffs asserted several federal securities law and common-law claims against the various defendants, essentially alleging that the defendants knew, or should have known, that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme. In February 2013, Citco replaced its former counsel with Paul, Weiss just as Judge Marrero entered an order certifying the class in substantial part. Paul, Weiss filed a Rule 23(f) petition on Citco's behalf seeking interlocutory review of the class certification order, identifying two principal grounds for reversal. First, Citco argued that plaintiffs could not prove reliance by common evidence and therefore could not satisfy the predominance requirement of Rule 23(b)(3). Second, Citco argued that plaintiffs' common-law "holder" claims, to the extent recognized under New York law, were derivative, not direct, and therefore that a class action asserting direct claims was not a "superior" method of adjudication within the meaning of Rule 23(b)(3). PwC also filed a Rule 23(f) petition. The Second Circuit granted both petitions, ordered briefing and heard oral argument in May 2014. The Second Circuit vacated the class certification order. In its ruling, the court concluded that the district court's order did not provide "sufficient factual findings as to how Rule 23(b)'s requirements are satisfied." In particular, the court found that the order did not indicate how common evidence could show the existence of a duty of care or reliance by the class on Citco's alleged misrepresentations. Accordingly, the court remanded for the district court to make additional findings on a more developed record. The Paul, Weiss team included litigation partners Walter Rieman, who argued the appeal, Brad Karp, Les Fagen, Allan Arffa, Andrew Gordon and Marc Falcone. June 19, 2014 Paul, Weiss Team Walter Rieman Allan J. Arffa Andrew G. Gordon

,斑奇迹专利号,专利代理人资格考试题,pct专利查询,产品外观侵权怎么鉴定,怎么查专利号查询

上一篇国家版权_网络图片侵权被告如何减少赔偿_怎么处理

下一篇专利号_中国专利公开_怎么处理

版权知识本月排行

版权知识精选